<\/p>\n
When Per Espen Stoknes looked at polls going back to 1989 assessing the level of public concern about climate change in 39 different countries, he found a surprising pattern in the data. \u201cIncredibly enough, it shows that the more certain the science becomes, the less concern we find in richer Western democracies,\u201d he said. \u201cHow can it be that with increasing level of urgency and certainty in the science, people get less concerned?\u201d<\/p>\n
After further research, Stoknes, the author of What We Think About When We Try Not to Think About Global Warming<\/em>, found some answers. He examined several hundred peer-reviewed social science studies and was able to isolate five main barriers that keep climate messages from engaging people, what he calls \u201cthe Five Ds\u201d:<\/p>\n \u201cI had to cheat a little bit with the last D \u2014 I lost one there \u2014 but it was the closest I could get,\u201d he admitted.<\/p>\n Distance<\/strong> deals with the fact that climate change is presented as far away, in both time and space. When climate models talk of 2050 or 2100, it seems like eons from now. We may feel for polar bears on melting ice floes, but they have little bearing on our day-to-day lives.<\/p>\n To Stoknes, the dissonance<\/strong> problem might be an even bigger deal: What we actually do every day conflicts with what we know we should do. \u201cIt makes us feel a little bit like hypocrites because I know it’s important, I shouldn\u2019t do this, but yet we do it and we do it all the time, every day: eat meat, drive a car, go by plane,\u201d he said. […]<\/p>\n Read the article:<\/span><\/p>\n\n
\n